← all videos

Testing four AI models on guessing how much bottle deposit (pant) I collected

Summary

Linus tests four AI models on how much "pant" (Danish bottle/can deposit) is in a bag of bottles and cans, based on photos of it. He shows each model's guess, then redeems the pant at a Netto reverse-vending machine; the receipt says 33 kr. ChatGPT came closest (30 kr), and every model guessed too low. He ends by asking viewers what to test next.

What happens

Spoken content

Danish. He says he tested 4 AI models on who best guessed how much pant he had from the photos, and that it was surprising who came closest. Guesses as stated: Gemini 21 kr, Grok 10 kr, ChatGPT 30 kr, Claude 18 kr. He went to Netto and the pant was worth 33 kr in total. - "Jeg har testet 4 AI modeller, i hvem der bedst gættede, hvor meget pant jeg har." - "I tested 4 AI models on who best guessed how much pant I have." - "Jeg pantede altså i alt for 33 kroner." - "I turned in pant for 33 kroner in total." - "ChatGPT var meget tæt på, men alle gættede faktisk under." - "ChatGPT was very close, but everyone actually guessed under." - "Hvad skal jeg prøve næste gang?" - "What should I try next?" Note: the automatic transcript renders Grok as "Rock" and Claude as "Klort"; corrected here from context. The caption names the versions tested as Grok 4.7, GPT 6 Astra, Opus 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon (as written by him; not verified).

Audio / music

Direct voiceover with no identifiable music; the sound is labelled "original lyd" (original sound) by Linus Reviews.

Topics & keywords

pant, bottle deposit, Netto, reverse vending machine, AI comparison, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, AI guessing test, receipt, Odense, Danish TikTok

Context

Light-hearted AI experiment, part of his Danish-language TikTok content (#dansktiktok, #pant, #ai, #chatgpt, #fyp). Posted 2026-10-19, 30 s, about 3,245 views and 47 likes at download time. Ends with a call for comments asking what to test next. The location is a Netto on Magnoliavej (printed on the receipt); the receipt dating is too small to read reliably.